Volume 116 Comment Publication

Please join us in congratulating the following associate editors, whose comments have been selected for publication in Volume 116 of the Penn State Law Review:

  • Brandt T. Bowman, Roll Sushi, Roll:  Defining “Sushi Grade” for the Consumer and the Sushi Bar
  • David Lee Miles Brown, Hey! Universities! Leave Them Kids Alone!: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez and Conditioning Equal Access to a University’s Student-Organization Forum
  • Kenneth R. Charette, Standing Alone?:  The Michigan Supreme Court, the Lansing Decision, and the Liberalization of the Standing Doctrine
  • Jonathan L. DeWald, Guardianships on Life-Support:  How In re D.L.H. Impacts Surrogate Decision Making In Pennsylvania
  • Alan C. Green,  Where Presumption Overshoots:  The Implications of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation v. Clayton on Pennsylvania’s Regulatory Schema
  • David I. Kelch, Help Me Help You: An Answer to the Circuit Split Over The Delegation of Post-Sentence Judicial Authority to Probation Officers
  • Rebekah Saidman-Krauss, A Second Sitting:  Assessing the Constitutionality and Desirability of Allowing Retired Supreme Court Justices to Fill Recusal-Based Vacancies on the Bench
  • Jacob Mattinson, Disclosure of Free Cash Flow Projections in a Merger or Tender Offer
  • Sara Ney, A Right to Exclude or Forced to Include? Creating a Better Balancing Test for Sexual Orientation Discrimination Cases
  • Katherine L. Pohl, Plowing the Path of Protection:  Understanding the Need To Establish Wineries’ Rights Under the Right to Farm Law
  • Marianne Sawicki, Empathy for the Devil:  How Prisoners Got a New Property Right
  • Jackie L. Starbuck, Redefining Searches Incident to Arrest: Gant’s effect on Chimel

All Penn State Law Review associate editors participate in a strenuous comment writing program beginning their Middler year, and must produce a comment of publishable quality.  A comment is a student-written periodical material, written in a style similar to law review articles.  Following the conclusion of the comment writing program, the Penn State Law Review editorial board chooses twelve comments for printed publication.